I'm not a hawk. I'm a dove--a heavily-armed dove.--Jack Kemp
Monday, August 10, 2009
Sunday, August 02, 2009
The Hollow Leader
Too many politicians think that the road to success lies in being "open." Too often that is simply another word for "hollow." I believe leaders must have principles, and must stand up for them. Jesse Helms
Saturday, August 01, 2009
The Socialization of America
"1. Karl Marx died on March 14, 1883, and was buried in the Highgate Cemetery in London, England. The assumption that Communism died with him was logical since only six people attended his funeral. But the truth is that it had not yet begun its murderous journey through the 20th century.
2. John Maynard Keynes was born on June 5, 1883, in Cambridge, England. His political, economic, and moral influence continues to affect every American.
3. The Fabian Socialist Society was an offshoot of The Fellowship of the New Life, which was born in October 1883 in London, England.
Socialist George Bernard Shaw added: 'You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possible be executed in a kindly manner.'
That's probably why Margaret Thatcher added that the 'problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.' "(emphasis mine)
Noebel, David A. The Socialization of America May 2009 (The Schwarz Report).
2. John Maynard Keynes was born on June 5, 1883, in Cambridge, England. His political, economic, and moral influence continues to affect every American.
3. The Fabian Socialist Society was an offshoot of The Fellowship of the New Life, which was born in October 1883 in London, England.
Socialist George Bernard Shaw added: 'You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possible be executed in a kindly manner.'
That's probably why Margaret Thatcher added that the 'problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.' "(emphasis mine)
Noebel, David A. The Socialization of America May 2009 (The Schwarz Report).
Monday, July 13, 2009
Human Nature
Saturday, June 20, 2009
The Siren Song of Socialism
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Priority
Saturday, June 06, 2009
The Politician v. The Statesman
"We need to revive, if only for the purposes of evaluation, the traditional distinction between the politician and the statesman. The statesman differs from the ordinary politician, in that he is able to envisage and inspire support for policies that are in the ultimate, best interest of the most people, and, however rare he may be, we think of him rightly as the politician par excellence. To the extent that the ordinary politician's vision is limited to that which is immediately expedient, to the extent that he is motivated by narrow, sectional, group, or personal interests, we think of him as a failure; and the more narrow his vision and selfish his aim, the greater the failure. The statesman is concerned with inspiring right action, and the test of his statesmanship is his ability to lead public opinion rather than slavishly to follow it. To lead public opinion does not mean to coerce or to beguile the individuals who make up the public but to persuade them by means of argument." John Hallowell, The Moral Foundations of Democracy
Sunday, February 04, 2007
A Military Statesman
This fight cost me everything. My career is over, my family is now homeless, we’ve lost a million dollar pension, but Congress agreed with me and rescinded the Navy policy, so chaplains are free again to pray in Jesus’ name. My sacrifice purchased their freedom. My conscience is clear, the fight was worth it, and I’d do it all again.--Navy Chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt, remarking on his being drummed out of the Navy for insisting that Navy chaplains not be censored for praying in Jesus' name.
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Are Statesmen Just Dead Politicians?

Is it true that a statesman is only a dead politician? It’s kind of like getting your picture on U.S. currency: the honor is reserved for the dead. Well, let’s consider that LBJ is a dead politician and was no statesman, and many believe that living politicians such as Roy Moore, Rick Santorum, and Henry Hyde are statesmen. Moore had much to lose, and yet he was willing to risk both reputation and career to hold high the principle that God is the source of law. In taking that risk he lost both career and reputation. Moore (and others like him) outshines his peers and deserves the accolade of “statesman” in the land of the living.
Saturday, November 19, 2005
The Contrast
Politicians do not mind campaigning as Sunday school teachers, deacons, and choir directors. But once elected, they often deny the sovereignty of God and feel embarrassed by anyone who acknowledges God. I openly acknowledged God and suffered the consequences: false accusations, charges, public embarrassment, and financial loss.--Roy Moore, So Help Me God
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Rulers of the Superstate
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
A Special Nation
The United States was a special nation founded on the laws of God, and not just any God. We were not founded on the faith of Buddha, or the Hindu faith or the faith of Islam, but on the faith of Jesus Christ.--Roy Moore, So Help Me God
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Sunday, August 21, 2005
Character and Democracy
Tyranny of Good Intentions
Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. — Daniel Webster
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Character and the Next Generation
It should be the highest ambition of every American to extend his views beyond himself, and to bear in mind that his conduct will not only affect himself, his country, and his immediate posterity; but that its influence may be co-extensive with the world, and stamp political happiness or misery on ages yet unborn. –George Washington
Charisma v. Character in Leadership
According to John Maxwell in Leadership Wired (vol. 5, no. 19) character is more important than charisma in leadership for the following reasons:
1. Character sets you apart—There was a time when people who lacked integrity stood out from the crowd. Now the opposite is true--charisma can make people stand out for a moment, but character can set them apart for a lifetime.
2. Character creates trust—Leadership functions only on the basis of trust. If you pull out trust, then you will lose your leadership foundation.
3. Character promotes excellence—If you lead people, good character sets a standard for everyone who is following you. People will eventually become like their leader. If leaders compromise on their standards, cheat the company, or take shortcuts, so will their followers.
4. Character gives staying power—During the tough times that all leaders face, character has the ability to carry you through, which is something that charisma can never do. When you are weary and inclined to quit, the self-discipline of character keeps you going.
5. Character extends influence—Charisma, by its nature, doesn't last long or extend very far. It's like a flash of gunpowder. It produces a quick, blinding light, but then it's gone. The only thing left is smoke. Character, on the other hand, is more like a bonfire. Its effects are long-lasting. It produces warmth and light, and as it continues to burn it gets hotter, giving fuel that burns brighter.
1. Character sets you apart—There was a time when people who lacked integrity stood out from the crowd. Now the opposite is true--charisma can make people stand out for a moment, but character can set them apart for a lifetime.
2. Character creates trust—Leadership functions only on the basis of trust. If you pull out trust, then you will lose your leadership foundation.
3. Character promotes excellence—If you lead people, good character sets a standard for everyone who is following you. People will eventually become like their leader. If leaders compromise on their standards, cheat the company, or take shortcuts, so will their followers.
4. Character gives staying power—During the tough times that all leaders face, character has the ability to carry you through, which is something that charisma can never do. When you are weary and inclined to quit, the self-discipline of character keeps you going.
5. Character extends influence—Charisma, by its nature, doesn't last long or extend very far. It's like a flash of gunpowder. It produces a quick, blinding light, but then it's gone. The only thing left is smoke. Character, on the other hand, is more like a bonfire. Its effects are long-lasting. It produces warmth and light, and as it continues to burn it gets hotter, giving fuel that burns brighter.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Clarity
God is sovereign and shall remain so despite what the Supreme Court and federal district courts of this land say. – Roy Moore, former Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, following his removal from office
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
In the Beginning...
BOWENBLOG will hit several topics, but you can count on most of it to be about politics from a Christian perspective. I’m sure there will also be some Christian apologetics thrown in for good measure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


